Quote ="Enicomb"> You make position redundant, not the person? So that would mean that role is no longer required? So you couldn't make someone redundant and then share their role out?
'"
Mostly correct, the position (job) is made redundant but usually this means that the workload is shared out elsewhere, as an example a friend of mine was at a senior grade in a civil service department until last April when a decision was made to make that grade redundant across the whole country and off he went with a settlement. His job function is still being performed by others (out-sourced and in-house) but that grade of management does not now exist.
Quote > Is it fair and legal that the person who has the final decision of who is being made redundant is very close to the group one of which is going to be made redundant from? (To make it simpler it's a team of 5 and 1 has to go and it's the direct manager making the decision) further to this, one of of those five is the managers son; is it correct that the manager should make this decision under these circumstances?'"
I don't think that sounds fair at all, either on the employees or the manager and if I were the manager I'd be asking to be relinquished from this duty to protect the company against a possible claim, whether its legal or not I don't know.