Messageboard Home Monday, August 03, 2020
Latest Articles
rhinoms Superleague ...
rhinoms Superleague ...
rhinoms Superleague ...
rhinoms Superleague ...
rhinoms Superleague ...
Navigation Messageboard
Contact Me
Web Links
Photo Gallery
Game Info
2015 1st Team Game Info
2014 1st Team Game Info
2013 1st Team Game Info
2012 1st Team Game Info
2011 1st Team Game Info
2010 1st Team Game Info
2009 1st Team Game Info
2008 1st Team Game Info
2007 1st Team Game Info
2006 1st Team Game Info
2005 1st Team Game Info
Hall of Fame
Tony Smith ('03-'07)
Barrie McDermott ('96-'06)

Click Here
2013 Sponsors List
2012 Sponsors List
2011 Sponsors List
2010 Sponsors List
2009 Sponsors List
2008 Sponsors List
2007 Sponsors List
2006 Sponsors List
2005 Sponsors List
Cheating 3, Honesty 0
Posted by southstander on August 15 2006 - 09:41:44

Real Reason?

The jury has sat....the decision is in....and Bradford Bulls have got away with a bit of community service!

The much awaited and anticipated hearing on the Bradford salary cap breach reached its verdict last night and penalised Bradford by two points and fined them 25,000. With the Bulls almost guaranteed fourth place, the two point deductions means absolutely nothing and the fine of 25k (15 suspended) will make little difference to the clubs finances.

Rather than the strong arm of the RFL maintaining the integrity of our great game its decision has left us the laughing stock of the sporting world and probably left Hetherington, Caddick et al. scratching their heads in confusion.

Six sides were found to have 'cheated' in 2005 by spending more then 50% of their income, or more than 1.8m, on players salaries. Of those six; one (a repeat offender) won the Minor Premiership; one (a repeat offender) won the Challenge Cup; and one (a first time offender) won the Superleague Grand Final. Evidence, if ever it was needed, that cheats can prosper. Cheating Clubs 3, honest clubs 0.

Of the two major transgressors, Bradfords is probably the most worrying, particularly in light of their apparently lenient punishment. Many eyebrows were raised at the end of season signing of ex-Rhinos hero Adrian Morley on a short-term contract. Morley settles in quickly and in a handful of games assisted in guiding the Bulls to the Grand Final and played a major part in their lifting the trophy against the Rhinos.

With the Bulls having being docked two points, the punishment for a 52-55% expenditure, they must have overspent the 1.8m salary cap by between 72,000 and 180,000. In reality this means that they could have spent 10% more than the Rhinos 1.8m on salaries, a large benefit in anyones books. How much of this overspend can be attributed to the salary of Adrian Morley? At 10k a game, probably quite a lot!

The Rhinos have taken the moral high ground by saying that they will not challenge the Bulls legal rights to remain in the record books as 2005 Grand Final winners, but many fans will believe that their 15-06 victory at Old Trafford last October is a travesty. Whilst the RFL have imposed the maximum penalty under their own rules, the revelations of the last week have proved that the punishments are not sufficient to ensure that clubs stick to the simple rules. The 'honest' six have been shown that they there is no benefit in sticking by the rules, in fact there is the exact opposite.

If it was my team that had cheated its way to silverware then I would be feeling extremely embarrassed by their actions. I would not be able to defend what my side had done, and I would be seriously thinking about whether I'd be renewing my season ticket for next year.



Remember Me

Lost Password?
Google Adverts
Member Poll
How will the Rhinos fare in the opening fixtures of the two part season?

Top of the pile

Top Four

Top Eight

Bottom Four

You must login to vote.
All The Latest News
Google Adverts

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us at so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network are not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Email RLFANS.COM's owners if further assistance is required.

(C)1999-2015 RLFANS.COM