SS.com Messageboard Home Friday, November 15, 2019
Latest Articles
rhinoms Superleague ...
rhinoms Superleague ...
rhinoms Superleague ...
rhinoms Superleague ...
rhinoms Superleague ...
Navigation
SS.com Messageboard
Home
Articles
Downloads
Contact Me
Web Links
Photo Gallery
Search
Game Info
2015 1st Team Game Info
2014 1st Team Game Info
2013 1st Team Game Info
2012 1st Team Game Info
2011 1st Team Game Info
2010 1st Team Game Info
2009 1st Team Game Info
2008 1st Team Game Info
2007 1st Team Game Info
2006 1st Team Game Info
2005 1st Team Game Info
Hall of Fame
Tony Smith ('03-'07)
Barrie McDermott ('96-'06)
Merchandise

Click Here
2013 Sponsors List
2012 Sponsors List
2011 Sponsors List
2010 Sponsors List
2009 Sponsors List
2008 Sponsors List
2007 Sponsors List
2006 Sponsors List
2005 Sponsors List
Saints 'Get Away With It'!
Posted by southstander on July 13 2006 - 07:00:43

Saints Counting?

There will have been little surprise at yesterdays announcement that the Saints were guilty of 'misconduct' over fielding an extra player for a short time in their game against Hull FC last month. There will, however, be amazement amongst all Superleague clubs (and probably within Saints themselves) at the extent of the punishment.

Once again Saints 'cheat' and get away with a pathetic 125.00 in fines, how they must have chuckled!

The precedent is now set, and set very badly!

Read more here...

Saints blamed the fourth official for allowing them to have fourteen players on the field for forty seconds of their single point defeat against Hull FC in early June. Kieron Cunningham entered the field as a replacement without another Saints player withdrawing and took an active part in the game for forty seconds before the mistake was noticed. Blaming the fourth official is the easy way out, Saints themselves must enforce the policy of 'one on, one off'.

It's no surprise that it was Saints who tried to 'push the envelope' but somewhat of a surprise that it has taken them this long, and that the ploy was not tried under the coaching of Ian Millward. Saints have quite a track record; the Tommy Martyn 'Foot of God'; breaching the salary cap; fielding deliberately weakened sides; betting against your own team; and, putting in late shots on opponents key playmakers (Nickle/Hooper/Forshaw/etc).

This decision could well backfire badly on the RFL. To punish forty seconds with 100 + costs implies that teams can buy forty seconds of an extra player for that amount. Logically, five minutes would therefore cost 750 and ten minutes a mere 1,500. If your team is defending a narrow lead or trailing by a few points, what is to stop you from sending on an extra player, or two, for the last five minutes. After all, 1,500 is not too high a price to pay for two points, especially if it means qulaification for the play-offs, or avoiding relegation. Take note Wakefield, Castleford and Huddersfield...this could be your salvation. If its good enough for Saints it should be good enough for you.

Surely the RFL should have come down harder on Saints and show them that cheats cannot prosper in our game. There must have been sympathy at Saints having lost the game in question, and you wonder if they had won by one point, perhaps scored when they had the extra man, whether the punishment would have been so lenient. A more fitting penalty would have been a one league point deduction for a lost game and a three league point deduction for a won game.

Over-reaction? Possibly!

But can sides really be allowed to get away with cheating in this manner?

Guest
Username

Password

Remember Me



Register
Lost Password?
Google Adverts
Member Poll
How will the Rhinos fare in the opening fixtures of the two part season?

Top of the pile

Top Four

Top Eight

Bottom Four

You must login to vote.
All The Latest News
YEP
Google Adverts

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us at loiners@hotmail.com so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network are not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Email RLFANS.COM's owners admins@rlfans.com if further assistance is required.

(C)1999-2015 RLFANS.COM